Which of the following best describes a situation that could constitute a violation of real estate license law?

Inducing a seller to break a contract for a second offer fundamentally violates real estate license law because it undermines the integrity of contractual agreements and the fiduciary duty owed to a client. Real estate professionals are expected to act in the best interests of their clients and to uphold legal and ethical standards. Encouraging a seller to breach an existing contract not only jeopardizes the original agreement but also erodes trust in the profession as a whole.

Contracts are legally binding agreements, and encouraging a breach can lead to legal repercussions for all parties involved. This conduct can also expose the real estate agent to disciplinary actions from regulatory bodies, making it a serious violation of license law. Engaging in such behavior undermines the principles of fair dealing and can result in penalties if reported.

In contrast, while accepting a contract without earnest money may raise concerns about best practices or industry standards, it does not inherently violate license law. Similarly, providing a verbal appraisal may not be legally permissible within certain contexts, but it does not automatically constitute a violation unless specifically restricted. Listing properties without a license is indeed unlawful, but the emphasis in this question is on the more active and unethical conduct of inducing a breach of contract, which is particularly egregious in the eyes of the law.